For detailed information about fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriological
water quality visit the U.S.G.S.
Water Resource Programs In Michigan.
For background information on E.coli, see "What
the heck is an E. coli?"
Magnitude
Despite the fact that elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria in water
are correlated with increased risk of illness, fecal contamination is
widespread.

In Minnesota, a 1996 report to Congress stated that 47% of the river
miles surveyed could not be used for swimming due to high levels of fecal
coliform bacteria. For some rivers the problem is pervasive -- over 90%
of the Minnesota River and its tributaries are consistently elevated.
For additional background information see our links
and news Web pages.
Problem
Although routine water monitoring is able to determine fecal coliform
loads, a simple reliable method to determine the source(s) of contamination
is currently unavailable. Possible sources include surface run-off from
manure-treated agricultural land or farm animal feedlots, failing or inadequate
septic systems, sewer overflow, and wildflife. Source determination is
important to develop effective control strategies. Furthermore, the presence
of fecal coliform bacteria in high levels may signal the presence of other
potential pathogens including Salmonella spp., Shigella
spp., hepatitis A virus, and Norwalk group viruses. A method that can
discriminate between human and animal fecal sources would provide a tool
to improve risk assessments of health effects associated with polluted
recreational water.
Possible Source Tracking Tool
The rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting technique is an easy, reliable, and reproducible
technique for E. coli source determination. This technique amplifies
DNA sequences between repetitive elements in the E. coli genome,
and generates a unique pattern of PCR products for each strain. The process
is outlined below.
Our complete process can be found on our methods
Web page. For more information about other methods of fecal source tracking,
such as antibiotic resistance profiles and ribotyping, see our references
Web page.
1. Template preparation for PCR reaction and amplification
Whole cells from single colonies are diluted into sterile 1% saline and then boiled for 15 minutes. The extract is then added
directly to a PCR master mix containing taq DNA polymerase, BoxA1R primer,
and dNTPs. The PCR reactions are placed into thermal cycler to amplify
DNA fragments between the repetitive element termed Box.
2. Electrophoresis, pattern analysis and classification
The amplified fragments are resolved in a gel matrix to
yield a genomic fingerprinting profile (similar to "bar codes"
in a supermarket). The gels are photographed and the digital images are
saved. The fingerprints are then analyzed by pattern recognition computer
software. A database, consisting of E. coli fingerprints from known
human and animal sources was constructed.
Implications
The ability to distinguish the sources of fecal contamination
is an important assessment tool, both for assessment of possible health
risks and to facilitate effective clean-up strategies. From a public health
perspective, contamination from human sources poses a greater human health
risk than that originating from animal sources. Armed with knowledge about
the sources of pollution, agencies could respond rapidly and develop more
tailored and cost effective abatement efforts.
|